Regarding the first issue, I have to disagree. It is often said that poker is just a long game. This becomes clearer in the setting of the money game. If you visit your local poker room a few days a week and always play $1 to $2 With No Hold’em Limit, the outcome of each session is unimportant. What matters is how well I do it overall, in the long run.
But much can be said about the tournament. Let’s say your poker room hosts a re-entry tournament every Tuesday night. The same purchase, the same structure, more or less the same field every week.
Come to think of it, what does it matter if you go back to the tournament tonight, or if you come back next Tuesday and play later? How can a player be injured because he has no money to come back? The difference between players who don’t rejoin and other players who rejoin on average once a week is not that rejoining players have an economic advantage. That is, one of them plays 40-50 entries a year and the other 80-100 entries access the online gambling agency Bonus138.
If you have the same skill level, you will get the same return on investment. However, rejoining players have no advantage over players who may or may not rejoin. Yes, players who re-enter are more likely to make money tonight and win today’s tournament. In this example, this probability is twice as high. But they also spent twice as much money on the win. If these two players end up playing at the same level, they will each win or lose the same amount per dollar invested in the entry.